Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Unterstand -- 2022 -- 4465 (bw).jpg

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Unterstand -- 2022 -- 4465 (bw).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2022 at 12:05:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Unterstand -- 2022 -- 4465 (bw).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Unterstand -- 2022 -- 4465 (bw).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and by XRay -- XRay 💬 12:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Info The ammunition depot is a monument and a reminder of the Cold War. The black and white image emphasizes the past, the elements such as lantern and fence show the context of the depot. --XRay 💬 12:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 12:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Although the fence is not contemporary is it? Perhaps the image is tilted? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• No, the image isn't tilted. The roof is tilted. It's for the rain water, see the pipe on the left. The fence is not parallel to the roof. --XRay 💬 10:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
• If you like, here is another view: File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck -- 2022 -- 4477.jpg --XRay 💬 10:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment A bit too busy. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral The image looks a bit too crowded and busy. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support When I browsed the WLM 2022/DE photos, this one catched my attention. It’s very difficult to create an appealing photograph of an unobtrusive monument like this Cold War reminder, and IMHO here this black-and-white photograph with its subtle elegance succeeds. --Aristeas (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian. Definitely a QI, though. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas --Kritzolina (talk) 08:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good documentation and a QI/VI, and maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not perceiving a great composition. This motif may not allow one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I wasn't sure at first but it grows on me, it could work as an artistic wall print Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Considering that almost anything can be considered "art" as long as it is mixed with similar productions, in this particular case I don't find the photograph very convincing. The color version does not galvanize me either. Like Christian and Daniel I find the picture busy, and like Ikan the composition appears average to my eyes. Not one of the best images of Wikimedia Commons in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian. -- Karelj (talk) 10:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. —kallerna (talk) 11:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Subject is very confusing, and surroundings doesn't help. I understand the intention behind using B&W, but it doesn't help to the unknowing viewer. --Fernando (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)