Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8896.jpg

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8896.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2020 at 10:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8896.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8896.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Family_:_Asteraceae_(Sunflowers)
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 10:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 10:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I understand the theme of nature reclaiming this place, but the composition doesn't make a really strong impression on me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting background and per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support For some reason I like it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Unfortunately one of the culms is cut off. I'd prefer to see the whole culm instead of the lower, unsharp foreground. --Llez (talk) 06:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

• You're (nearly) right. I'd seen the calm, but the calm was very long and so there would be a lot of empty space above. --XRay ^talk 06:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose I see what you're going for, but it doesn't work for me. Also, only one part of the image is in focus and even that's not too detailed. At full resolution, the yellow flowers look burned (or maybe something else is going on) so you can't see the details on them. Buidhe (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the main problem is the distracting background, with the railings (?) at the top left. Otherwise this is a nice idea and I think you should give it a go again if you get the chance to do this kind of shot. Cmao20 (talk) 01:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you for your review. In the background you can see the gate of a bunker. It's a photograph of an ammunition depot so this small part helps to symbolize the reclaiming nature. --XRay ^talk 04:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

• OK,  Neutral because I think that's quite a nice idea. I guess what I really want is for that to be obvious from looking at the photo though, and I don't think it really is. Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I don't think it will become a FP. So it's better to withdraw the image. Thank you for all your reviews! --XRay ^talk 05:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /XRay ^talk 05:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)