Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2017 -- 6924-30.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2017 -- 6924-30.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2017 at 18:09:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info all by XRay -- XRay talk 18:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Support -- XRay talk 18:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry it is beautiful, but the quality leaves something to be desired. There is traces of red CA in the branches top left, most of the photo seems a little overprocessed especially the right side and all the leaning things on the right side should have had some perspective correction, that is easy to see when there are built structures there plus a guy on a bench.
- I'll check the image for the issues especially the CAs. --XRay talk 04:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Weak support Thanks for fixing the issues. :) The "weak" is because the light in this and the other photo still bugs me a little, not exactly sure why. --cart-Talk 09:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I think this is a gorgeous photo, and I'm confident the problems noted by cart will be lessened during the review period. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support
Also perspective correction, and for me there are bad light conditions. Otherwise a good photo.Better now. -- -donald- (talk) 06:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC) - @W.carter, Daniel Case, and -donald-: Now I've made a perspective correction and CAs should be removed. Thanks for your hints. --XRay talk 04:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Strange and unnatural light for me as well. -- Pofka (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Question - Is the light really that strange? You all are photographers who look closely at light all the time, so I have to respect your reactions, but I find them surprising because I feel like I've seen and experienced light like this on some cloudy days. I think there must be some unusual issue in the white balance that's putting you all off and not fazing me at all. But I feel like it can't be that far off, or it would bother me, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)- Oppose The lighting and composition don't work for me. The cloud covering most of the left side and extending 2/3 of the way to the right interacts poorly with the tree branches at the left in my opinion. It would also be better if the scene were brighter overall (in terms of the quality of light; this is not something that can be fixed by brightening the image in post). To answer Ikan's point, I think the problem is that shadows were pushed too much; I think the scene looked darker in reality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 19:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Daphne Lantier 22:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
