Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Uhrwerk -- 2019 -- 3056.jpg

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Uhrwerk -- 2019 -- 3056.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2020 at 18:18:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Uhrwerk -- 2019 -- 3056.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Uhrwerk -- 2019 -- 3056.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Horology
•  Info The clock in Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. A sharp, high-resolution photo of a beautiful and intricate mechanism. created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 20:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Though it’s a technically good image (of a fascinating piece of machinery of course), it still lacks excellence in my eyes. Mainly the lighting is too harsh, causing reflections and dark shadows, and the wooden beams on the left are just distracting. A (nearly) still subject like this could have been taken better. I happened to take File:Aue Friedenskirche Uhrwerk.jpg a few weeks ago without much preparation, I even didn’t have a tripod with me. While my pic is far from being nominated here, I think I got a somehow better (even) lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 07:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

• Clearly not a better lighting with these blown highlights. Big technical problem on the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
• IMO it depends on the church. The clockwork is not easily accessible in every church. --XRay ^talk 07:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Agree with Kreuzschnabel, also I don't fancy the beam in the bottom. —kallerna (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I actually like the lighting; it models fine details quite nicely. --Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Thank you, Cmao20, for nominating! --XRay ^talk 06:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 19:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Horology