Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crystal Mill Power Plant.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Crystal Mill Power Plant.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2021 at 06:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#United States
Info created and uploaded by StaticSparks - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 06:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)- Weak Support It's a very nice image, though the 8 MP resolution could be better. We have an existing FP which is 30 MP, though it is far from sharp at pixel level. Still, the difference in composition and lighting is sufficient for me to accept two FPs of the same subject; this one has a more tranquil, less in-your-face feeling. We also have some very high-quality photos by Carol Highsmith, but they lack the magic of the golden aspens. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Oppose I think this is one of the problems with WLM in countries with plenty photographers. We often get images that don't add a lot to our existing collection. Yes we have six excellent, high-resolution (48MP) sharp photos by Carol Highsmith and an excellent FP. This slightly soft 7MP image might have golden trees, but so does the better FP (which really glow in that photo), and the difference in light here is due to it being overcast (hence the photographer has chosen not to include the sky). This Highsmith is from the same viewpoint but includes much more context surroundings, and has lovely summer sky. The hard sunlight in that photo highlight the 3D of the rocks and wooden structures. This photo here just seems like any ordinary tourist snap on an overcast day. -- Colin (talk) 08:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Strong oppose Photoshopped. Big cloning problem at the bottom right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Per Basile Morin -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Neutral Bottom right looks not natural, sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 13:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Nice but a bit lacking in definition at full size. I think the other FP is better. Cmao20 (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Colin and Basile. Per the former, looks more like a photographed painting or illustration, and per the latter ... OUCH! Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --IamMM (talk) 19:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
