Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2021 at 20:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info View of the Cruzeiro de Setúbal (Wayside cross of Setúbal) and the Monastery of Jesus, Setúbal, Portugal. The wayside cross dates from the 16th century, while the monastery, founded in 1490, is one of the oldest buildings in Manueline style (Portuguese version of Gothic) and served as a monastery of Poor Clare nuns. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)- Support Beautiful light and colors, only slight damage from the bit of modern building on the right (but that's reality). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan, good composition, quality and light. Cmao20 (talk) 21:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Neutral Composition is awkward with features on the left and right that detract from the image. The nearby cross looms large, emphasised by the wide-angle perspective. The colourspace is wrong (ProPhotoRGB) and should be sRGB. ProPhotoRGB is too huge for 8-bit JPG leading to posterising and incorrect colour and nobody has a display that wide anyway. The scene could probably have benefited from HDR to retain some detail on the highlighted bricks. -- Colin (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- The file name would imply that HDR has in fact been used. But I guess you could argue the scene could have benefited from *more* HDR :) Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, as now two of you complain about the building on the right, I cropped it out along with a chunck on the left (and I used sRGB to export it). Thanks for the hints. Poco a poco (talk) 18:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also added an additional version with a new HDR merge, detail is better for highlights now, does it also apply to the overall result? --Poco a poco (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- I did complain slightly about the building on the right, but I think the more generous crop on the right was better, even with the bit of the modern building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for elaborating your point. I'd like to hear other opinions before I offer an alt version Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment Looking again at it I would second Ikan’s view. The building at the right was ugly, but overall the more generous crop was more balanced. But more voices are welcome ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Regretful oppose Love the colors and the work that went into this, but like Colin I find the composition awkward. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 06:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 14:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Daniel Case --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan (for the cropped version) -- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
