Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Contortionist Eliza, "Show Contortion is a Cabaret" 02.jpg

File:Contortionist Eliza, "Show Contortion is a Cabaret" 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2017 at 18:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Contortionist Eliza, "Show Contortion is a Cabaret" 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Contortionist Eliza, "Show Contortion is a Cabaret" 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created and uploaded by Steffen Günthel, nominated by Yann (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose A lot of CA all around. Fixable. Otherwise good. --Code (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Code, "a lot of CA" seems to be quite exaggerated. I see a small purple line on the top of the hat... S.Günthel, could you look at that? Regards, Yann (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - It's a striking photo. I think it would be OK to feature as is, though I expect it to be corrected. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose not my cup of tea, sorry... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Code. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Definitely this pic has some good "arguments" --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose "Contortionist", really?? She's just sitting there stiking a pose, looking like something out of a gentleman's magazine. There is no 'wow' in that for me. If it was one of the other photos from the series where she acually do something, I would consider it for FP. Those photos also show just as much of her "arguments" to satisfy the male audience here. ;) --cart-Talk 11:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I hesitated to nominate another one of the series. Ultimately, I find her expression here is better. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Done CA removed. However carter was a joke. Composition,light and quality are good...--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot! @Code and Daniel Case: Ok for you? Yann (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

• Unfortunately there's still some CA at her right arm and on the chair-whatever-thing she's sitting on. --Code (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

• @Code: Could you please leave a note, as I don't see what needs to be edited. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

• @Yann:  Done --Code (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

• Why am I not allowed to not be 'wowed' by the same things you are? --cart-Talk 12:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

If I may, I think Livio was saying that he was joking, not that you were a joke. In Italian, "Carter, era un scherzo"; no "it" is necessary for meaning in Italian, but I think he left out a crucial comma by mistake. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

So this is how international conflicts are started. ;) Italian has never been my strong side... --cart-Talk 18:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

more than anything else is a "european" conflict carter. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

 aridone @Code: @Yann: @Daniel Case: I think is fine now --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)