Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cityscape and skyline by the Copenhagen Lakes, Denmark - (36018109956).jpg

File:Cityscape and skyline by the Copenhagen Lakes, Denmark - (36018109956).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2020 at 22:14:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cityscape and skyline by the Copenhagen Lakes, Denmark - (36018109956).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cityscape and skyline by the Copenhagen Lakes, Denmark - (36018109956).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Denmark
•  Info created by Kristoffer Trolle - uploaded by B2Belgium - nominated by B2Belgium -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment "super high resolution", I don't think so... --Cart (talk) 22:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

• Well, you can look inside people's living rooms from the other side of the lake... But that wasn't why I nominated it. Rather the mood, the colours, the composition, the fact that it captures a historical landmark (the chicken). Etc. -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral the van is completely washed out. Seven Pandas (talk) 00:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but the description and the file name are not very good. "Super cool" and "super high" are very POV statements that should be removed before the nomination. Also, I think that it needs a bit of a crop from the top and the bottom. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, I looked into renaming the file before the nomination but didn't see any category that was immediately applicable. I suppose this could still be done later? -- B2Belgium (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

• B2Belgium, a file should always be as neat and tidy as possible before you make the nomination. You have made enough noms to know that. Fixing things after the nom is a bad idea, since most people tend to forget to do that and doing it during the nom will mess with the codes. But I will fix this for you now and sort out the name, codes and description to get this messy nom back on track. --Cart (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment It looks very nice, but there are stitching errors on the column of windows under the "IR" of "IRMA KAFFE" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

• You are right. I don't have the technical expertise to fix this. Maybe someone else knows how to do this, otherwise I will withdraw the nomination. -- B2Belgium (talk) 07:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

• I don't think this is a error, this is an architectural feature.--Ermell (talk) 08:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

• Indeed, the building is not straight: [1], [2]. Good news. Thank you, Ermell! -- B2Belgium (talk) 09:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting. I had a doubt, but looking at the rows of bricks, they really looked strange at a certain level. Now I know this is weird in reality :-) Thanks, Ermell -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support 132 mpx seems super-high to me . I enjoy the different colours of reflected light here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The image quality deteriorates at the left and espec. at the right (starting below and right of “friske” and “AG” the building and the trees are not sharp anymore), but overall this is a good image, and together with the reflections it is really impressive and beautiful. Of course, we should remove the advertising from the file name when the nomination is over ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 12:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nicely done. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Killarnee (T•R•P) 15:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - Nice for sure, but I haven't decided whether the composition is an FP to me or not. However, I do see posterization in the sky that ideally should be smoothed out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Eatcha (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Linear arabesque isn't working for me and there is posterization in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose Halos on building edges at sides; looks overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Denmark