Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Circular staircase of the Vatican Museums.jpg

File:Circular staircase of the Vatican Museums.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2014 at 20:18:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Circular staircase of the Vatican Museums.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Circular staircase of the Vatican Museums.jpg

•  I withdraw my nomination All by Livioandronico2013 -- LivioAndronico talk 20:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico talk 20:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great idea and definitely a QI, but unsharp in too many places. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

• Hallo Daniel Case,can you leave a (o more) note for see the problems? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 22:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

But you talk of the people unsharp? If you talk of people the effect is created on purpose --LivioAndronico talk 22:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I understand why the people would be unsharp (at least the moving ones), but there are parts of the banister that are also wanting in the sharpness department.

Per the comment below I will refrain from noting them unless there are further support votes. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment We already have two FP of the same staircase from a similar point of view: 1, 2. In this one there are too many people all over the place imo. --Kadellar (talk) 23:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

• I know it and the thing is done on purpose, there is a limit of people for the FP? --LivioAndronico talk 00:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

• It’s not a question of limit of people. The idea behind FPC is just not going to the place where a recently promoted FP has been taken, then take and nominate another similar one :-) it should be somewhat different at least to success, in order to gain some variety. – In this case, I suggest to put up a D&R issue vs. the very similar File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg, the technical quality of which falls below todays standards (sharpness, noise). File:Vatican Museums Spiral Staircase 2012.jpg shows a different view. --Kreuzschnabel 08:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Kreuzschnabel, I don't think that Livioandronico2013 choose to go to the Vatican museums in order to take same picture as an existing FP! Though if he had, so what. That's a hugely popular tourist destination and a popular staircase for photographs. But certainly, our FPCs should be compared against their peers at FP and other quality photos of the same subject/category. A delist isn't necessarily required, and the old photo has some merit (shot on film, different lighting/contrast, fewer people). -- Colin (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I didn’t mean to suppose he actually did so, that’s why I put the ":-)" behind it. --Kreuzschnabel 19:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks guys.