Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cimetière de St-Jean de l’Île-d’Orléans.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cimetière de St-Jean de l’Île-d’Orléans.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2022 at 19:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Canada
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support — Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 21:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Most of our other cemetery FPs are in the “Places/Other” gallery, therefore I propose to use that gallery link here, too. --Aristeas (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The tree takes the focus away from the cemetery. I didn't even realise I was looking at one until I saw the title. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose somewhat per above. I feel like, if you cropped about the same distance to the left and right of the tree, the composition would be better, although people might still complain that parts of the tree are too dark. Alternatively, if you had about twice as much cemetery to the left of the tree than you do now, that might be enough to balance the tree out visually. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- I can't do that because there are other trees that disturb the scene --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Shadow on the tree is also very dark and distracting. I think I see what you might have been seeing, but the camera just didn't capture it this time. You might have had a better chance with a stronger sky. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have raised the shadows --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Apart from the too dominating tree, the graves as such look washed-out with many blown bright areas (petals and leaves of flowers). Light seems too harsh for this scene; contrast of dark tree vs. bright graves might be controlled better by a careful development from the raw file. As it is, I do not see what’s so outstanding about it, sorry. Might be QI but nothing to feature. --Kreuzschnabel 12:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a new development, I appreciate the feedback, thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- … and again the votings here refer to several different versions. This is most confusing. When reworking a nomination, please nominate the new one as an alternative to keep votings apart. Or either, if you don’t want to give it a different file name, withdraw your first nomination and place a fresh one. --Kreuzschnabel 19:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Do you think it is necessary to upload another file despite being only a minor change over the same picture, I added comments about the changes. IMHO If someone wants to check the corrections is more easy to check the upload history --Wilfredor (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a new development, I appreciate the feedback, thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)