Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of St. Teresa Interior 3, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Church of St. Teresa Interior 3, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2015 at 09:37:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Pofka -- Pofka (talk) 09:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)- technically perfect, but the distortion on both sides are too big and ugly, sorry --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I think I'd have to agree with you. It was not one of my most successful interiors. I didn't do the scene justice. Diliff (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- The altar (and decorations around it, especially top) is captured perfectly here. That's why I've nominated this one. Certainly, not best Diliff interior picture, but without doubt best picture of this church in Commons. This church interior looks so dark in all other photos and this one has that warm gold gloss and lovely detail. There is another version taken from further, however I prefer this one altar-only over it. -- Pofka (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- For "best picture of a topic/scope" we have com:VIC. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Also, as a suggestion, maybe I could crop this image so that the distortion is minimised. There isn't a lot of visual interest beyond the altar anyway. What do you think Pofka / Wladyslaw? Diliff (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not Pofka nor Wladyslaw, but I was trying the same at home and think it's worth the try (and in the hope you provide an enlarged crop). - Benh (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I really believe this photo has a chance to be FP. Not only because it is "best picture of a topic/scope", but because it is a really good capture of altar. As Diliff said, there really isn't a lot interesting before the altar (interior paintings requires restoration, IMO). Altar definitely is the main figure in this church. Previously I saw when some windows or doors became FP. Why altar alone can't? Try cropping it, Diliff, if that is really required. :) -- Pofka (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Pofka. Wladyslaw, Colin, Benh, I've reprocessed the image from the original files. I've been able to crop it so that the altar comprises most of the frame, while maintaining the original resolution (actually the horizontal resolution of 6000px is the same, but the vertical res is actually higher now - 4764px vs 4388px previously - due to the aspect ratio change). I've also made some minor changes to the exposure too (slightly brighter, more neutral WB, less overexposure in bright areas) which I hope is a slight improvement. There is still some distortion on the top corners of the altar, but this is still an ultrawide view and can't really be helped. You can decide whether it's enough of a change to support, but I believe the changes are significant enough to justify a second look at least. ;-) Diliff (talk) 11:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- That's just exactly what I was speaking about. Great. This altar alone is impressive enough. -- Pofka (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Per above Support now. Great. -- Colin (talk) 09:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)- Support. Reprocessing from the original RAWs gives it just enough to get over the line for me. Diliff (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Per David. Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support better, the arch were just too painful to look at. Not your best, but as mentioned elsewhere, the bar is so high... - Benh (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Kreuzschnabel 07:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors
