Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cheroot Smoking (edited).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cheroot Smoking (edited).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2023 at 18:27:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info created and uploaded by Anton Gutmann, retouched by Radomianin - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- A very impressive portrait, another find from WLF Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support The tight crop leads to a very concentrated expressive effect – the smoker seems to look directly into my soul. --Aristeas (talk) 19:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 06:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support I can practically smell the smoke. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Smoking cigarets can seriuosly damage your health and even life. -- Karelj (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- And we should not have any featured images of dangerous activities? Kritzolina (talk) 14:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment There is a FP that contains a burning child. Just saying. TheBigBookOfNaturalScience (talk) 18:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think this oppose reason should be annulled. Photographs of self- or other-destructive subjects can be good or bad as photos, and it's not like smoking doesn't merit documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek and Kritzolina: Many (if not almost all) of Karelj's oppose votes make absolutely zero sense, FWIW. Unfortunately, there isn't any policy that I'm aware of that allows invalidating a vote, but one oppose vote over 12 support votes isn't going to do much except prolong this nomination for an extra four days. It sucks, but it's sadly the way it is. SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 I know - I just don't like nonsensical things to stay unchallenged on our projects. Kritzolina (talk) 06:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ditto – I just wish something could be done about it. SHB2000 (talk) 06:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 I know - I just don't like nonsensical things to stay unchallenged on our projects. Kritzolina (talk) 06:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek and Kritzolina: Many (if not almost all) of Karelj's oppose votes make absolutely zero sense, FWIW. Unfortunately, there isn't any policy that I'm aware of that allows invalidating a vote, but one oppose vote over 12 support votes isn't going to do much except prolong this nomination for an extra four days. It sucks, but it's sadly the way it is. SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think this oppose reason should be annulled. Photographs of self- or other-destructive subjects can be good or bad as photos, and it's not like smoking doesn't merit documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Striking portrait -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice close-up! --SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men