Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Charleroi - boulevard Pierre Mayence 4 - 2017 - 04 - sgraffite.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Charleroi - boulevard Pierre Mayence 4 - 2017 - 04 - sgraffite.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2017 at 18:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sgraffito in a house of Charleroi build in 1908, restaured in 2016.
  • Is it that bad? I often wait a while before voting even if I've made a decision. But note that in the case of Mile's mosque ceiling, no-one at all voted for some time. It took me a while to make up my mind, and now a bunch of people have voted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected my vote. Daphne Lantier 07:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The cable is a form of vandalims from some ignorant persons (désolé, ma langue est le français : le câble a été replacé après la restauration de l'œuvre par un technicien ignorant cette restauration et son coût. Certaines œuvres ruinées par l'action de l'homme ont obtenu le label. Modestement, je pense que cette photo répond aux critères.) --H2O(talk) 19:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support The cable is a relatively minor part of the image, and it doesn't bother me that much. Daniel Case (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Cable and dirty concrete in the bottom. -- Pofka (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild  Oppose - I have a lot of trouble deciding on this nomination. If the colors were more vivid or perhaps the light were a bit more intense, I might feel impelled to vote for a feature. More pinpoint focus at full size could help sway me, too. But I guess if someone put a gun to my head and demanded a decision, I'd go with "not outstanding enough to feature", whereupon my mild opposition. However, this is a good picture, and it should be nominated for VI. There's currently another photo of sgraffito in Charleroi at VIC, on the point of passing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]