Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chandelier of the nineteenth century in the Museo di Capodimonte (Napoli).jpg

File:Chandelier of the nineteenth century in the Museo di Capodimonte (Napoli).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2016 at 08:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chandelier of the eighteenth century in the Museo di Capodimonte (Napoli).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chandelier of the eighteenth century in the Museo di Capodimonte (Napoli).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, weak, because of the low DOF (unsharp ceiling paintings). I needed quite a long time to understand this chandellar, just to imagine the light effect in this room (I love italian chandellars!), I presume, its not the 18th, it´s the second half of the 19th century. But I haven´t found any information about. --Hubertl 10:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Danke Hubertl,I preferred a less DOF to focus on the lamp (if you want see the paint are here [1] and here [2]). The staff tell me is about 1875 and was later converted to electric by candles.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment So I´m right, its the second half of the 19th century. You should change the filename. --Hubertl 11:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

 Done thanks--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

• But the filename needs to have "nineteenth century" and not "eighteenth century" in it. I understand that in Italian, it's the ottocento, but if you're using English, we call it the 19th and not 18th century (though it's also called the 1800s). I agree with Hubertl's remarks, but since the level of detail in the depiction of the chandelier strikes me as really impressive, I do vote to  Support featuring this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Óðinn (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 20:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Filename, description in the filepage and categorization must be changed.--Jebulon (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment  Done, Done and...why the categorization? Thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Very weak support per Hubertl. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Venca24 (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Livio, You can be a good fashion designer :) --Laitche (talk) 10:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects