Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Celing of Wien Hauptbahnhof (Vienna Main Station), Austria 01.jpg

File:Celing of Wien Hauptbahnhof (Vienna Main Station), Austria 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2021 at 19:03:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Celing of Wien Hauptbahnhof (Vienna Main Station), Austria 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Celing of Wien Hauptbahnhof (Vienna Main Station), Austria 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
•  Info all by Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Info Taken at Vienna's Main Station with a mobile phone, while rushing from one train to another. I've always liked the image's composition and lighting but, as a self-diagnosed camera nerd and pixel-peeper, didn't think much of its quality. That changed when I printed it and found out it looked great! Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Definitely a bold subject with not that many pixels to peep, so the cell phone quality works here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Minimalist beauty. --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, composition isn't working for me. Amazing, but not outstanding enough for FP in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 10:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Question Any particular reason for this orientation ? This might look different (and better) if you turn it +90 or -90 degrees. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 07:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

• Fair point Dey.sandip, I too was on the fence about the image's orientation. These skylights are quite lanky, so I opted for this particular crop and the landscape orientation to make it look more boxy than it actually is. Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

• •  Support OK :) --Dey.sandip (talk) 10:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per King. Daniel Case (talk) 17:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support yes! --El Grafo (talk) 08:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral Wonderful composition, but JPEG artifacts. --XRay 💬 13:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

• Indeed XRay, and regrettably already present on the unedited JPEG. Since then I have wised up and started using a 3rd party app that provides access to the mobile camera's original raw file (or I use the HEIC format when I want to take advantage of the phone's computational photography abilities) Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Yes nice abstract, a bit of a shame about the artefacts but I have seen much worse than this pass. Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I like abstracted shapes. Support despite the mentioned technical shortcomings. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations