Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Petrópolis, Brazil.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cathedral of Petrópolis, Brazil.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2016 at 18:37:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Catedral de Petrópolis or Catedral de São Pedro de Alcântara (St. Peter of Alcantara Cathedral) is located in Petrópolis, near Rio de Janeiro, in Brazil. All by. -- The Photographer (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment I'm sure there's another way to re-nominate an FP than changing part of the tile to English. A /2 or something? Anyway, the original nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Petrópolis, Brasil.jpg. -- Colin (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Doesn't address any of the issues I raised in the previous nomination. All that seems to have happened is that the image has been cropped vertically, lightened a little, some reflections on the floor cloned-out, and the white parts of the walls and dark wood gone over with a very heavy NR brush. The rest of the image is still as noisy, the stained glass no clearer or sharper, and the colourspace still AdobeRGB. The crop is an improvement, but the interior really would benefit from multi-frame HDR to capture this dynamic range noislessly. -- Colin (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- I corrected noise specifically located on the roof shadow areas and some areas that seem noise is really cement texture, the reflection of the floor was corrected using cloning, stained glass no clearer or sharper and
Overexposed because its not a HDR, I'm fixing right now AdobeRGB to RGB. I don't have a equipment (external shooter) to do HDR. Thanks for your comments. --The Photographer (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- I corrected noise specifically located on the roof shadow areas and some areas that seem noise is really cement texture, the reflection of the floor was corrected using cloning, stained glass no clearer or sharper and
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - The standard of featured pictures of church interiors is extremely high, as witness User:Diliff's photos, but also several other people's work. The ceiling is unsharp in this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Colin & Ikan. INeverCry 03:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Ikan. I can forgive the noise and blown windows given that it's a long exposure, but the image should at least be sharp. Colin's suggestion for HDR might well be one of the few instances where that would be desirable for FP status. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
