Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casino de Constanza, Constanza, Rumania, 2016-05-27, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Casino de Constanza, Constanza, Rumania, 2016-05-27, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2017 at 06:37:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Blue hour view of the Constanța Casino, a casino located directly in front of the Black Sea in Constanța, Romania. The building, listed as historic monument by Romania's Ministry of Culture and Religious Affairs, is considered a symbol of the city and it was built in Art Nouveau style according to the plans of Daniel Renard and inaugurated in August 1910. All by me, Poco2 06:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 06:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)- Support despite the issues noted ... they're tiny abberations in an otherwise excellent blue-hour pic. Daniel Case (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Daniel: Oops, I oversaw Uwe's notes, they are addressed now. Poco2 18:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Killed by HDR. (for colors) --Mile (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)- Support --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support The sky seems a bit unrealistic blue but is still o.k. for me--Ermell (talk) 20:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
*
Oppose the sky and its shade of blue, sorry... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Ggia (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, too much blue and too much yellow, the whole color scheme looks unnatural (I know that it may be what the camera produced but it still looks a bit too much). --cart-Talk 20:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Diego, several folks have objected to the strong yellow light on the facade of the casino building. My assumption is that there is one or more strong yellow light source(s) we don't see, but I think it would be good for you to address this directly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment I cooled the WB, what do you think? @Ikan Kekek, W.carter, PetarM, and Martin Falbisoner: @Ermell, Daniel Case, Cccefalon, and Ggia: Poco2 18:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)- Comment @Poco a poco: The sky is too bright in relation to the lights of the ships in behind. That´s why the whole appears unrealistic.--Ermell (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Diego, unlike Ermell, I don't have expertise in how much light ships use at what time of night. The photo looks good to me, but since there's been so much controversy about the yellow light, I'd feel more confident in voting to support if you would explain where the yellow light was coming from. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Request this image is too surreal for me. Can you please try and test an completely different HDR setup? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)- Comment Could someone please kindly explain the difference between the current image and this one? Especially Cart who supported the linked one but opposes this one? -- KennyOMG (talk) 16:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I've uploaded a new version after adjusting curves and WB but this is rather a kind of tapping in the darkness. Alchemist-hp there is no issue with the HDR processin as the brighest frame looks simnilar to the final result. Ikan the only lighting I can think of was from the building in front of it, an aquarium, I was standing on its roof (please, don't tell anybody, I don't think that I was supposed to do that...). KennyOMG, that's a good question :) Poco2 19:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Good enough for me. And yeah, Kenny, very good question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support much better now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support --★ Poké95 06:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
