Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cardinal (86755).jpg

File:Cardinal (86755).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2023 at 03:07:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cardinal (86755).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cardinal (86755).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)
•  Info Female northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  03:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  03:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I am not really into bird photography, but this little one has charm and is presented just as it should --Kritzolina (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful, good light, sharp, not oversharpened. --Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Strong support An excellent photo that, unfortunately, makes me a little sad. I mentioned the last time you nominated a picture of a female of this species that we had one as a pet, legally (long story). Sadly she died in an accident I don't want to talk about (granted, she was over 18 years old, ancient by the standards of her wild counterparts) earlier this year. The bird in this picture looks more like her than the other one, and it did make us warmly nostalgic. It is indeed a striking and exemplary picture of the female of the species. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Rosalina 🍵 479235 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support As always you have been very good at capturing the image through a golden light that in this case seems to kiss every detail and every feather of the bird. -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Lupe (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)