Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caracalla 6033 dettaglio Museo Nazionale Napoli.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Caracalla 6033 dettaglio Museo Nazionale Napoli.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 20:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)- Support Great, really striking "portrait" of a great ancient Roman sculpture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Great image with matching color background. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Question have you applied vignetting in the postprocessing? Poco a poco (talk) 09:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment No I havn't. I've tried it after your suggestion but I don't think it is any better. On the other side those exhibits in the museums have all sorts of strange lightening difficult to deal with. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback, fine to me if it is like this for real, Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Statue seems great in thumb, but where is focus ? Even if i put it to 50% it is like unfocused. Otherwise i would put some more back on top. Second image is much better, just crop bottom, clear standing and would be similar like this. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)- Support --Commonists 18:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough. -- Karelj (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Weak support Wow! Definitely one of the best photos of a sculpture I have ever seen – the bust itself, the angle of view, the light, the background colour, the soft vignetting etc. sum up to a vibrant, very adequate portrait of Caracalla’s problematic character. It’s a pity that the sharpness is not as great as the rest, but taking photos in museums is very difficult and the high resolution partially compensates for that. --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You did not saw mine, or what ?🤔😎--Jebulon (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Dear Jebulon, I am sorry but I do not understand your comment. It seems you are upset; I am sorry for that. I had not the intention to offend anybody by my comment. I said “one of the best photos”, not “the best photo”, so my comment does not deny that there are other photos of sculptures on the same level of “wow”. Of course your photos of sculptures, e.g. from Delphi (recently promoted) or from the Louvre, are also great. --Aristeas (talk) 06:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but I expect more sharpness. --Ivar (talk) 10:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with the opposes above, lots of pixel but the lighting conditions have been very tricky Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Aristeas.--Jebulon (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose Unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose DoF too shallow, otherwise nice. --Kreuzschnabel 08:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose Beautiful, but really noticeably soft even when I simply let it fill my screen without zooming in. Feels like the sensor is out-performing the lens by miles in terms of resolution. That's unexpected from a high-end system like this. Maybe it's just a focus issue (fingers crossed!), but if that keeps happening with this lens (and this lens only), you might want to send it in for re-adjustment. --El Grafo (talk) 08:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your review. I guess there is nothing wrong with the lens. Probably you didn't notice that the picture was taken with 1600 ISO for the light conditions and I'm not supposed to use a tripod in this museum. The noise reduction obviously reduced the sharpness. But the point is that FPCs and photos should be evaluated for what they are and what they comunicate and not what they should be according to the more or less high end equipment. I'm very satisfied with it even on a 32'' screen as many other reviewers. Cheers--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
