Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canadian Senate Chamber.jpeg

File:Canadian Senate Chamber.jpeg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2022 at 07:48:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Canadian Senate Chamber.jpeg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canadian Senate Chamber.jpeg

SHORT DESCRIPTION

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Canada
•  Info created & uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'd like this to be a bit sharper and twice as big. But a good QI and presumably a good VI nominee, if offered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Ikan about the sharpness and size, but this is the best image we have of the interior of this building on Commons. Good enough for FP status for me. -- IamMM (talk) 06:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment That's a VIC argument to me. I'd like to hold FP for a better image of this great building's interior. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

• Although the sharpness and resolution are not very high by today's standards, it seems OK for 2014. The framing well covers the key elements of the building such as the ceiling, paintings and the main hall, and the light is fine in my eyes. This one has the best presentation among the images in the Category:Chamber of the Senate of Canada and considering this, it can deserve a star but I understand why such tolerance may not be desirable for perfectionist FPC users. If the nom is passed, whenever a picture with better details is uploaded it can be delisted and replaced. -- IamMM (talk)

• True. My feeling, though, is that we shouldn't judge this as if it were 2014 today; we're judging it today. I think it's different when we're dealing with much more obviously historic photos, such as one taken 110 years ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan Kekek. -- Karelj (talk) 10:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per IamMM. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per IamMM. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 02:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose 6 MP interior is no longer impressive. Also, since GFDL-only is banned at FPC, I think in the same spirit we should not be promoting images that use any deprecated licenses as the "finest freely licensed images on Commons". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)