Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CP 5600 Sabugal - Benespera.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:CP 5600 Sabugal - Benespera.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2022 at 13:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info Another lovely train photo with IMO really nice composition and colours. created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support The trees and bushes look a bit unnatural to me (due to noise reduction?), but it’s a striking view with good composition and colours. --Aristeas (talk) 06:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment This effect is very pronounced for structure sizes that are a bit below the resolution of the camera. Strangely the drone camera seems to be more prone to this than my DSLR, I can't really explain why, maybe something with the debayering isn't ideal. I don't really have a solution for this; reducing noise reduction doesn't help. --Kabelleger (talk) 12:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation! It’s good to know that this is an effect of the camera itself and not of overdone post-processing (I thought that there was too much noise reduction, this can sometimes show a similar effect). Well, I think it’s still good, especially because the train and other important structure are not affected by it. --Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Nice shot and good quality, but surrounding is not very wowing. In any case less then other train-shots of Kabelleger.--Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)- Oppose I agree. Not one of the very best shots on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Milseburg; still good for a QI nom though. --A.Savin 12:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Very weak oppose If this were someone whose work I'd never seen before, nominating for the first time, I might have been willing to consider supporting. But I know David's work well, and he's nominated—to our approval—much better (Still definitely a QI though). Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
