Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Building at Caldas da Rainha.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Building at Caldas da Rainha.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 21:11:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal
- Info created by Luís Gaspar - uploaded by Luís Gaspar - nominated by Luís Filipe Figueiredo Alves Gaspar -- Luís Filipe Figueiredo Alves Gaspar (talk) 21:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Luís Filipe Figueiredo Alves Gaspar (talk) 21:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Needs a better description and categories. Please read: Commons:Categorias --Cart (talk) 14:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light & blown sky, insufficient sharpness, perspective distortion. I see the idea of the winding elements but this is certainly not the best shot that could ever be taken of it. --Kreuzschnabel 15:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Andrei (talk) 15:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kreuzschnabel -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose There's an interesting idea here in terms of the contrasting shapes, but as it is it suffers from the issues Kreuzschnabel mentions. Cmao20 (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Certainly there’s an interesting idea here. However, on FPC we don’t judge ideas, we do judge photographic work, which is the skilled elaboration of good ideas. --Kreuzschnabel 11:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kreuz--Boothsift Is Here 06:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment First of all, I apologize for my English. This comment is not a criticism of all who have judged my photos, rather on the contrary, I appreciate the sincerity and capabilities of all, and the works of most of their authors. Nor do I intend to justify the quality of the photographs I have submitted. I just want to point out that by aesthetic/conceptual option, I do not make any modification of the photos (colors, perspective, contrasts, framings, etc.). This don’t means that i do not admire the work of some photographers who use to do post production or use software that integrates multiple images (macros, interior of temples, etc.), only that my aesthetic option is different. Thank you all. Luis Gaspar--[[User:Luís Gaspatr|]
- Comment What counts here is nothing but the resulting image. There’s no plus or minus score for the technique used to produce it, so you won’t earn a bonus for your decision to not post-produce your images :) --Kreuzschnabel 21:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I know that :) :) --[[User:Luís Gaspar]
- Comment What counts here is nothing but the resulting image. There’s no plus or minus score for the technique used to produce it, so you won’t earn a bonus for your decision to not post-produce your images :) --Kreuzschnabel 21:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment First of all, I apologize for my English. This comment is not a criticism of all who have judged my photos, rather on the contrary, I appreciate the sincerity and capabilities of all, and the works of most of their authors. Nor do I intend to justify the quality of the photographs I have submitted. I just want to point out that by aesthetic/conceptual option, I do not make any modification of the photos (colors, perspective, contrasts, framings, etc.). This don’t means that i do not admire the work of some photographers who use to do post production or use software that integrates multiple images (macros, interior of temples, etc.), only that my aesthetic option is different. Thank you all. Luis Gaspar--[[User:Luís Gaspatr|]
- Oppose, per Kreuzschnabel; time to withdraw nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination [[User:Luís Gaspar]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Boothsift Is Here 07:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)