Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (01811).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (01811).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2023 at 02:11:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae
- Info Moss and lichen-covered blue oaks in Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (California). I've toyed with nominating this since I uploaded it. I find the layers of this forest beautiful, with bushes below, moss-covered trunks in the middle, and lichen-covered branches at top. There are obvious technical problems (mainly DoF, with some blurry branches in the foreground), but perhaps others find the scene special enough. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Unusual but fascinating (works in full screen mode); it seems like a scene from a scary movie. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. Imagine this photo as a wallpaper in a bar … --Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin -- Jakubhal 15:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating at full size --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, it isn't working to me. I don't find the composition good. Maybe a focus on the top of the trees would have looked better, but like this it lacks wow to me without anything else than compensates that. Poco a poco (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't get the composition. And why the blurred leaves in the foreground? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charlesjsharp and Poco a poco. Looks like a random picture to me, very messy. Sorry. Je-str (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Strong support Looks like something you'd see in a fantasy TV series, film or videogame. What's imperfect about it as a photograph makes it work as an image. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Rosalina 🍵 454344 05:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support I do think it should be a featured image just from the atmosphere it radiates, but the focus doesn't lie well on anything in particular. Nothing is super sharp. --Explodingcreepsr (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charlesjsharp and Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. --StellarHalo (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support I've given myself time to react to this composition, but in the end, I get it, and it works both as a linear arabesque and a three-dimensional composition. The mossy tree limbs produce their own lines that contrast with and interact with the rest of the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae