Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boston skyline from Museum of Science garage roof - HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Boston skyline from Museum of Science garage roof - HDR.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2017 at 17:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info created by Bill Damon (Flickr) - uploaded by Pi.1415926535 - nominated by Sportsguy17 -- Sportsguy17 17:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Sportsguy17 17:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - That's really pretty, but there's an artifact near the bottom right that must be fixed, and on a less serious level, I really like the light reflection that's all the way over to the left but would like a bit of room to its left on the picture frame. If both of those things can be addressed, I would reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:
I can look into fixing the artifact.(Not seeing the artifact either.) I'm not sure there's much I'm going to be able to do about the room on the left because this is the same photo found on Flickr without any cropping. Sportsguy17 19:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:
- Oppose Not sure what artifact Ikan sees. I see several little burnt holes where the HDR has not handled highlights properly. The framing doesn't extend to the whole bridge. The technical quality is ok but lower than many of our FPs but most such FPs are considerably higher resolution than this 9.7MP so I can't really say it is comparable to FP level for such city sky at night scenes. -- Colin (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- I might not be using the right terminology; maybe "burnt hole" is more specific, but I'm seeing one just below the 2nd-to-leftmost boat. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan and Colin. A nice effort from Flickr, but I think better pictures of the Boston skyline from that vantage point are possible. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--DeFacto (talk). 08:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)