Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blue eye, by Amanda Dalbjörn, 2017 (Unsplash).jpg

File:Blue eye, by Amanda Dalbjörn, 2017 (Unsplash).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 13:40:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Blue eye, by Amanda Dalbjörn, 2017 (Unsplash).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blue eye, by Amanda Dalbjörn, 2017 (Unsplash).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Amanda Dalbjörn, uploaded by Fæ, nominated by Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but too noisy. I don't understand what there is a reason for this. --Hockei (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose, somewhat per Hockei. The composition doesn't really make sense to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise aside, the 3/4 window reflection in the eye is not the best way to light such a subject. Actually being outside would have been better. I also suspect the blue in the eye is oversaturated. --cart-Talk 07:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

• It is not necessary to be so patronising. She is not the only one of us with a bit to learn. Charles (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

• Not my intention at all, apologies if you think it sounded that way. Sentence is removed. --cart-Talk 16:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose First, the unsharp brow is distracting; second, a composition like this makes me think of sci-fi paperback covers where we see that the eye belongs to an android, a cyborg or something like that. Since it apparently doesn't here, I feel let down by the payoff I didn't get (Basically, when you do this there should be something interesting about the eye itself to draw us in). Daniel Case (talk) 15:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition and light, but there's too much noise.--Peulle (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Daniel Case. -- Pofka (talk) 14:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think the comments here are really meaningful, but well... Yann (talk) 09:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 09:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)