Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Dipper Ursa Major over Old Faithful geyser Yellowstone National Park Wyoming Astrophotography.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Big Dipper Ursa Major over Old Faithful geyser Yellowstone National Park Wyoming Astrophotography.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 05:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
- Info created by Astroval1 - uploaded by Astroval1 - nominated by Astroval1 -- Astroval1 (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Astroval1 (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the image quality here is not good enough even considering the very difficult conditions. — Julian H.✈ 07:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality is really too low. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressive view, but per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: per above. -- KTC (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Alternative version[edit]
- Info I reduced noise in Photoshop. Sky colors keep the same (it is Airglow). I am living in NYC with big light pollution. From home use technology to cleaning up light pollution, but such post processing not working for real dark sky – it is also clean up real colors of airglow. For airglow sky noise reduction a little bit different. Sorry, I hope it is better now. Thanks! Astroval1 (talk) 8:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but at maximum size still not acceptable. --Tremonist (talk) 14:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment A pity! Great composition! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Alternative version 2[edit]
- Info Thanks for comments, I learn a lot! One more attempt. Thanks! Astroval1 (talk) 1:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)