Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg

File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
•  Info Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000. This one made me work. The number of photos stacked is actually not so important, if you have a "twilight zone" on the subject, like here. 8, shots and hours.
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support it looks pretty cool--Andrei (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The white background is too bright and having no frame doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

• Charlesjsharp I think there are wannabe rules to avoid watermarks and borders. Beside check the image on the article, the border is always added. Who will want to print outside can add it, the main cause is to represent crankset on Wikipedia. And it represents very well. --Mile (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

• The subject is sharp, but you could have chosen a different background. Image description is misleading. You show a lot more than the crankset. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  17:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The subject holds no appeal for me, but I can appreciate the effort that went into it, and it's easily the best and most interesting photo of this motif. Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles ... it's a very busy composition, the attempt at simplicity notwithstanding. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Forgive me if this sounds really dumb, but isn't the crankset the part buried behind the nice smooth chainguard? As far as bicycle mechanisms go, it's a nice image, but it looks like the image here is of a branded chainguard Kingsif (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

• Kingsif road bicycles normaly don't have chainguard. "Silver" part above is front derailleur. --Mile (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

• No, the black bit. The circle. The guard covering the chain and thus crankset. As I said, that looks like the main focus - the derailleur is in the corner, if you were wanting that to be the focus then it's very badly cropped - since it appears to be covering up the crankset. I was asking if said chainguard is supposed to be considered part of the crankset. Kingsif (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
• I added notations, that is bidon halter in the back. Chainguard - yes and no. On professional bicycles no, on city bikes yes. This is a Pro bike from Giant. Nothing is covering 1st chainring, while front derailleur is set on 2nd chainset (small one). Back of them is plastic bidon holder, mounted on frame. If there some else put notation. --Mile (talk) 15:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

• You don't appear to have understood me at all, or are deliberately ignoring the point. Is the bidon the black circle in the middle of the image? No, so I clearly wasn't referring to it. Kingsif (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

• Son Kingsif. Do you own a road bike or something similar. "black circle in the middle of the image" are two chainrings, part of crankset. I would ask Admins to check "puppet status" of newkinder. You dont know to put notation beside what is bothering you. Don't wanna learn you here about bikes etc. It's about the picture. --Mile (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC) p.S. Does anyone get what is his question, Ikan Kekek  !?

• Who, me? I've ridden bikes, of course, but I'm hardly an expert on the names of bike parts. So no, I don't know what he means. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Charles and Daniel. Kingsif (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Kingsif Asking again, put NOTE on picture where is problem !? I think you mixed chainset with a chainguard. --Mile (talk) 13:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

• @PetarM: You don't have to ping me demanding an answer to something twice when I haven't edited since before the first one, that's harassment. I'm also far from "newkinder" (newcomer?), I just only appear in FPC once a year or so because I mostly edit Wikipedia. Of course I own a bike, and I fix it up myself. Besides that, I'm afraid I cannot understand literally anything you typed because you clearly don't speak English, which I have to assume is why you don't understand my very simple question. My oppose is based on the composition, and my understanding that I can't see the crankset behind the guard. If you want to dispute that, answer my question rather than talk about other random mechanisms then use allcaps and exclamation points at me. Kingsif (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
• Kingsif "Forgive me if this sounds really dumb", your words. Maybe just to skip my nominations, OK !? --Mile (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

• That's going too far. Don't tell people how to vote. --Peulle (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
• Peulle it already went too far. Kingsif jest called me dick-dickish on my discusion. And where do you see i ask how to vote. Putting minus because he dont understand the picture is a big difference. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

• The vote is valid. Telling people to skip your nominations is not proper form. For conflict resolution between users, I recommend following the procedure at COM:ANU. --Peulle (talk) 09:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
• Mile, I only left user warnings after your incredibly inappropriate behavior. After you took it too far, read the diffs. Kingsif (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Without pedals it looks to me like uncompleted otherwise good job Poco a poco (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others