Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bessen van een Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. 28-02-2023. (d.j.b).jpg

File:Bessen van een Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. 28-02-2023. (d.j.b).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2023 at 17:41:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bessen van een Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. 28-02-2023. (d.j.b).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bessen van een Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. 28-02-2023. (d.j.b).jpg

983

497

108

108

3456

3456

What's going on here?

1728

464

173

184

3456

3456

And here?

1361

464

173

162

3456

3456

Here too

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
•  Info Berries of an Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. Focus stack of 15 photos.}}
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Question is the original background digitally replaced? If so, there should be info about that on the descrption page. Color of the pedicle edge (light blue) doesn't match with the background colour. -- Ivar (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

  Answer: Everything about the photo is purely natural and made in the garden.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Neutral postprocessing has left sharp edges on the plant. -- Ivar (talk) 06:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

• Note: If you look closely at the stem (of ~1.5mm thickness) you will see vertical veins on the stem. The bottom grain is a palpably sharp edge that probably reflects some light. (The unedited photo has the same border).--Famberhorst (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

• When you say 'purely natural', do you mean that no man-made background was used please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

• Answer: yes, that's what I mean. It's a natural background.--Famberhorst (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Question Something seems not quite right. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 469517 01:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks good to me. And nice green background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Very detailed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral Some weirdness on the reflections at the top of some of the berries. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae