Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berdorf (LU), Aesbachtal -- 2015 -- 4550.jpg

File:Berdorf (LU), Aesbachtal -- 2015 -- 4550.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2017 at 19:46:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Berdorf (LU), Aesbachtal -- 2015 -- 4550.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berdorf (LU), Aesbachtal -- 2015 -- 4550.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info all by XRay -- XRay ^talk 19:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 19:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Unsharp foreground on the left is slightly distracting to me and might be cropped out, but I don't know what that would do to the composition. And the composition is the main reason I support this picture. It's a kind of lovely miniature landscape, with the cobwebs between the plants accentuating their formal relationship in the picture frame. It's best viewed at full screen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 21:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 04:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm too distracted by all the plants on the bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel Case, a tighter crop would to accentuate the main subject would be nice.--Lucasbosch 14:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
• I think I'll crop out a part of the bottom within the next days. --XRay ^talk 19:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel Case. Too many random plants that are in focus distract the viewer. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others an no wow for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Fixed @Daniel Case, Lucasbosch, King of Hearts, and Uoaei1: Crop is now improved. Hopefully it's better now. Thanks for your advice. --XRay ^talk 16:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

  Sorry, still doesn't work for me. There are a lot of in-focus plants on the ground, so I don't think there's any way to fix it by cropping. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

• Wow, this is the first time I realized that you're objecting not to out-of-focus plants but to in-focus plants! You're considering this a macro of the two plants, not as a miniature landscape. I don't think in a landscape you'd normally want everything but 2 large trees to be a blur, would you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

•  weak oppose I like the image but I'm not wowed. The colours don't "pop" enough - everything seems too dull. Probably changeable with different processing though. -- Thennicke (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)