Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beached fishing vessel, Nørre Vorupør, Denmark 2017-04-14 3.jpg

File:Beached fishing vessel, Nørre Vorupør, Denmark 2017-04-14 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2017 at 08:54:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Beached fishing vessel, Nørre Vorupør, Denmark 2017-04-14 3.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beached fishing vessel, Nørre Vorupør, Denmark 2017-04-14 3.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
•  Info This is the same boat that Slaunger photographed (see his description at the FP nomination of the rudder/propeller photo) Note the protective rails and hull reinforcement, to enable this wooden boat to be dragged onto the beach. For this photo, I concentrated on the bold colours and patterns on this fishing boat while capturing its location on the beach, complete with dog. -- Colin (talk) 08:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 08:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support works for me (maybe you'd like to straighten the horizon. It's a tiny bit tilted) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Martin done, thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support PumpkinSky talk 10:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 11:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose tilted --Mile (talk) 12:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Etiquette

Mile tilt fixed. Mile, it is polite not to oppose for easily correctable and rather minor issues like this. If you compare other nominations elsewhere, people leave comments rather than votes for such. -- Colin (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC) You are worried too much, simply minusinsg till corrected is better option, sicne i saw before, a shot wasnt corrected, because it had so many pluses, author didnt even care about...till i mentioned to voters issue. When they decline support, he undergone correcting... so, how should i know some will correct something. --Mile (talk) 13:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Perhaps it is you who are "worried too much": you could just trust other nominators and usually reasonable requests will be taken on board if offered with good faith and politeness. An oppose here says to me you don't trust me to fix it, which isn't COM:AGF. Is a <0.3° tilt really so horrendous that it means an image is not FP standard? Is a level horizon what makes this an FP? There is a phrase in English: "Don't sweat the small stuff". -- Colin (talk) 13:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support a refreshing change to see such a clean hull. Wonder if they plan to launch that puppy from the beach? Atsme 📞 15:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

At first I thought you were just calling the boat a "puppy" but then I took a closer look ... Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I love that texture. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier 04:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support As I already said on Flickr. --Code (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I feel too biased to vote, but I think Colin has captured the texture and lines of the hull excellent here. I like the dog by the way - it adds a sense of scale. Just for information this vessel is also an element of this this FP. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, the composition isn´t working for me. The thick hull is to dominant. I like to zoom out. Further more the dog spoils the shore-setting. --Milseburg (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 14:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport