Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aquila heliaca vs. Eudorcas thomsonii.JPG

File:Aquila heliaca vs. Eudorcas thomsonii.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 00:44:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Aquila heliaca vs. Eudorcas thomsonii.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aquila heliaca vs. Eudorcas thomsonii.JPG

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Unsorted
•  Info created and uploaded by Cmocho, nominated by Amakuha. --Amakuha (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. I understand that the picture doesn't have 40+ MP and is not technically impeccable, but I think the scene is incredibly dramatic and rare. I use it as a wallpaper on my 17 inch display and the quality looks sufficiently good to me. Moreover, there seem to be very few featured pictures of eagles in general. --Amakuha (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A very impressive scene, but having nothing sharp at 4 MP is just too much even for a wildlife action shot. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree, but I think this would be a good valued image, so please nominate in the appropriate scope at COM:VIC. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per KoH. Impressive but that doesn’t quite excuse the lack of quality here. --Kreuzschnabel 06:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 09:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lovely action shot with plenty of wow, but the quality is just a little too low for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support One of the most beautiful images I have seen in a long time.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically awkward, thus not a FP, but definitely a valuable document, per KoH and Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others ... I don't need to look at it at full-res to see the technical issues. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I think this is a good example of why we allow 2 megapixels photos at FPC. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)