Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna South-4588.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Annapurna South-4588.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 16:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- InfoAnnapurna South, also called Annapurna Dakshin or Moditse, is a mountain in the Annapurna Himal range of the Himalayas, and the 101st-highest mountain in the world. It was first ascended in 1964, and is 7,219 metres tall. The nearby mountain Hiunchuli is in fact an extension of Annapurna South. created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Very beautiful, but there are weird sharpening artifacts, probably due to the image being insufficiently sharp to begin with and then oversharpening to compensate. (Also, I think you can crop out some of the featureless black area at the bottom.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Thank you:) please review once again, weird sharpening artifacts are gone now. Best Regards Bijay chaurasia (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortuantely, at 9 MP this level of unsharpness is unforgivable IMO. Compare, for example, to File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 25.jpg, which is worse at full res (46 MP), but much better at 4000px (10 MP). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Thank you:) please review once again, weird sharpening artifacts are gone now. Best Regards Bijay chaurasia (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment LHS appears to be blurred (foreground and distant mountain). Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per King. I'd love to see a bigger, sharp photo of this motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with the above. Beautiful photo but just not quite sharp enough for the size. Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per King of ♥ --Llez (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Great idea but huge technical issues remain ... the ridgeline to the right of the summit is still oversharpened-looking, and then it gets as unsharp as it does on the left. Lastly I find all that darkness up front a little distracting from what is admittedly pretty beautiful. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results: