Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna Base Camp, Ghandruk, Nepal.jpg

File:Annapurna Base Camp, Ghandruk, Nepal.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2018 at 16:33:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna Base Camp, Ghandruk, Nepal.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna Base Camp, Ghandruk, Nepal.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Rosan Harmens, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 16:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 16:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose No. Having worked with this file, I'm in no way impressed by the quality of this. The sky wouldn't pass QIC with that amount of artifacts and posterization; the CA is almost visible at thumb. As for the name, where is the base camp, I can't find it. It might have been taken from said camp, anyway I don't find it accurate. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

• @W.carter: I changed the description. Do you think the CA and the sky can be fixed? If yes, help would be welcome. I don't know how to do that. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

• Removing the CA is no problem but fixing the sky is really hard. With such posterization the result would probably not look natural. I don't have time for such work right now though. --Cart (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
• Looking at it again, I don't find it worth the effort of a patch-job, the quality and composition is just not good enough. --Cart (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Reviews are getting more irrational by the day. The sky is OK at 6 Mpx, which is sufficient for a large print. BTW I added more light and contrast. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

• In this case, I think that comment is a bit unfair. You know by now that if a photo is wow-y enough, I will certainly overlook technical shortcomings. When I said I wasn't impressed by the quality of this, that included the quality of composition and light, both which are unremarkable here. Even at thumb or preview size, this photo doesn't evoke any emotions in me. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 07:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Cart. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)