Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amphithalamus vallei 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Amphithalamus vallei 01.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2016 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
This is one of the smallest shells of my collection. Its size (0.9 mm) is a little bit larger than the dot at the end of this sentence.
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure what happened, but it's really unsharp at full resolution. --Ivar (talk) 16:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, for it is only 0.9 mm! Please compare with other FPs of objects of this size --Llez (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I guess such small object is already beyond the range of macro-photography, imo specialized equipment is needed (like scanning electron microscope). --Ivar (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Info I used a binocular --Llez (talk) 17:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'm sorry, but looks like binocular is not good enough, because the final sharpness is imho not acceptable. --Ivar (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Info I used a binocular --Llez (talk) 17:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I guess such small object is already beyond the range of macro-photography, imo specialized equipment is needed (like scanning electron microscope). --Ivar (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, for it is only 0.9 mm! Please compare with other FPs of objects of this size --Llez (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ivar. Usually these have been razor sharp, but here we've got posterization and some color noise. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 19:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)