Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète cf01.jpg

File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète cf01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 17:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète cf01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète cf01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support :-) But please fix the position of the location template. --XRay ^talk 17:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@XRay: I don't understand, what do you mean? Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, my misunderstandig. I thought 'location' should be placed under 'information', but above is possible too. --XRay ^talk 18:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support On the one hand the building on the right disturbes the harmony, on the other hand it gives a good contrast, including by shape and colour. And this image is really crispy sharp! Good job done. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I don't love that the bowsprit is caught in the building and maybe it's a teeny weeny tad overprocessed, but since the photo makes me wish I was there taking an evening stroll along the quay, it works. The light is magical. --cart-Talk 18:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Cart and Baso. PumpkinSky talk 19:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Nice atmosphere. I think verticals might be leaning slightly outwards, but within the margin of error. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support for a full resolution picture, this is quite sharp.--Nikhil B (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Not easy to get the ships sharp with that exposure time. Well done.--Ermell (talk) 07:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Doesn't wow me, exactly, but it's a really good composition, in part because of reasons mentioned above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport