Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alex Schomburg - Harl Vincent - Marvel Science Stories for April-May 1939 - Illustration for Newscast.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Alex Schomburg - Harl Vincent - Marvel Science Stories for April-May 1939 - Illustration for Newscast.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2015 at 09:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Alex Schomburg - restored, uploaded and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Info Not my most extensive restoration - this one, outside of one big stain, wasn't too bad. Still, a fine example of 30s Sci-fi art that I have strong proof of the copyright-free status (the Penn State University link). Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 11:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Bowled-over support It looks like you printed up a new copy. Great work! Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support You might want to consider removing the scratches through the soldier's gas mask and headphone cable though. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- I think those are meant to be traces of some sort of gas or wind or something. They look just intentional enough that I wouldn't like to remove them without seeing a second copy of the image that doesn't have them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like accessing a second copy is not that easy. Next to the obvious buying another copy off ebay, I think this entry from Virginia Tech and their Speculative Fiction Project might be an option. Great reddit post by the way. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- I think those are meant to be traces of some sort of gas or wind or something. They look just intentional enough that I wouldn't like to remove them without seeing a second copy of the image that doesn't have them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)