Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Advanced Test Reactor.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Advanced Test Reactor.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2012 at 19:42:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Matt Howard - uploaded by Euratom - nominated by Bulwersator -- Bulwersator (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support, amazing photo of w:Cherenkov radiation -- Bulwersator (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, unclear image, confusing composition. Tomer T (talk) 11:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Getting a clear picture of this situation is nigh impossible, given the amount of water and the cherenkov radiation. Is this proper use of FPX? Those reasons suffice for an objection, but an FPX? Kleuske (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Any reason is good for FPX. It shortens the death struggle of an image. FPX is easily overridden by supporters anyway. พ.s. 12:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Kleuske, maybe you're right, but I still don't think this image has a chance to FP. Tomer T (talk) 06:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Getting a clear picture of this situation is nigh impossible, given the amount of water and the cherenkov radiation. Is this proper use of FPX? Those reasons suffice for an objection, but an FPX? Kleuske (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Kleuske (talk) 14:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose - Blur Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)