Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Admiring Turkish Lamps on Arab Street.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Admiring Turkish Lamps on Arab Street.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2024 at 21:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
- Info Something different. I know some of the lamps are out of focus but I don't think it matters because the girl is the main focal point. created by Henry Vante - uploaded by Henry Vante - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition whose main actress, although possibly staged, appears natural. One of my favorites from the Wiki Loves Living Heritage competition in Singapore; thanks for the nomination! -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Mine too - I actually prefer it to the image from the competition that won third prize because the composition and the girl's expression is better, + no 'sale' sign visible! Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Right, in the third place image, the scenery seems more staged. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per the nomination --Kritzolina (talk) 07:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. Thank you for the nomination, Cmao20! --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It could have been made at a slightly lower exposure to avoid all the blown details of the lamps, but the composition and subject makes up for this. --Cart (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Phoenix CZE (talk) 16:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 22:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNatsuikomin (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Natsuikomin, it is usually considered proper etiquette to give a reason for an oppose vote. Cmao20 (talk) 02:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's unique because my reason is related to etiquette as well. But, since many don't really care of the etiquette, I prefer not to explicitly state the reason. Anyway it seems that my vote will not affect the nomination very much as we see those many supports. Natsuikomin (talk) 03:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Natsuikomin, With respect, I disagree. You are the only person on this page right now on any nomination who has provided an oppose vote without justification, so I disagree that many people ignore the etiquette that you should provide a reason. Unless you mean that you think there is something in violation of proper etiquette about this image itself, in which case I would very much like to know what it is. I don’t want to nominate something if it is considered offensive but I can’t judge on that unless I have a reason. Also, the vote certainly does affect the nomination because without your vote the nomination could be closed by the five-day rule and promoted immediately (if an image picks up at least 10 support votes and no opposition after five days, it is immediately promoted), whereas now I will have to wait the full nine-day period before I can nominate a new picture. Cmao20 (talk) 03:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Umm, your second sentence was simply a false claim, but thanks for commenting. Did you ever do this as well previously, making wrong allegation? See my below reply. Natsuikomin (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a false claim. You can easily search the FPC page to find that every single oppose vote on every nomination right now provides a reason for their vote, even if it is as simple as ‘per another user’, except yours. I am sad that you say I’m making false allegations. Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Natsuikomin: Welcome to FPC and thank you for your contributions. Regarding the opposing vote, there is a fixed instruction in the rules on how to give it. You can read it in detail here. In particular, the rule stated: Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). I kindly ask you to give a reason for your vote with respect to other active reviewers, nominators and photographers. Thanks in advance. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just remember this, You all will be responsible for all your votes that support the nomination. After all, anyone that ignores the common etiquette I referred to can cross out my vote if he/she considers my vote invalid, Thank you. Natsuikomin (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am confused. I try to be kind and to follow ettiquette wherever I can. What am I missing here? What etiquette are we violating? Kritzolina (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just remember this, You all will be responsible for all your votes that support the nomination. After all, anyone that ignores the common etiquette I referred to can cross out my vote if he/she considers my vote invalid, Thank you. Natsuikomin (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am very confused too. I don’t think anything I said was impolite and I believe that I am fully within my rights to ask for someone to provide a reason for their oppose vote out of simple courtesy. Nobody wants to disregard Natsuikomin‘s opinion or consider it invalid, what I want is to know what the objection to the nomination is. Otherwise what is the point of the discussion? FPC is about building a consensus and if someone opposes without stating why, their oppose vote is useless in changing others’ opinions.Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Don't worry. You're polite. It was me who was too sentimental and sensitive. I'm truly sorry to all of you.
I apologise. Natsuikomin (talk) 12:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Don't worry. You're polite. It was me who was too sentimental and sensitive. I'm truly sorry to all of you.
- I accept your apology, but you are still breaking the rules by not offering a reason for your vote. Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am very confused too. I don’t think anything I said was impolite and I believe that I am fully within my rights to ask for someone to provide a reason for their oppose vote out of simple courtesy. Nobody wants to disregard Natsuikomin‘s opinion or consider it invalid, what I want is to know what the objection to the nomination is. Otherwise what is the point of the discussion? FPC is about building a consensus and if someone opposes without stating why, their oppose vote is useless in changing others’ opinions.Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Natsuikomin, With respect, I disagree. You are the only person on this page right now on any nomination who has provided an oppose vote without justification, so I disagree that many people ignore the etiquette that you should provide a reason. Unless you mean that you think there is something in violation of proper etiquette about this image itself, in which case I would very much like to know what it is. I don’t want to nominate something if it is considered offensive but I can’t judge on that unless I have a reason. Also, the vote certainly does affect the nomination because without your vote the nomination could be closed by the five-day rule and promoted immediately (if an image picks up at least 10 support votes and no opposition after five days, it is immediately promoted), whereas now I will have to wait the full nine-day period before I can nominate a new picture. Cmao20 (talk) 03:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Natsuikomin, it is usually considered proper etiquette to give a reason for an oppose vote. Cmao20 (talk) 02:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Well, the rules explicitly state that one should explain one’s reasoning for an oppose vote, and since the only oppose voter continues not to explain their reasoning, I consider this nomination to be promoted by the five-day rule. I will not nominate another picture until someone else has reviewed this nomination and decided if my action in striking this vote is correct. Cmao20 (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Cmao20, I think you can regard Basile’s review of the bot promotion (thank you, Basile) as a confirmation that your action was correct, and I understand the rules in the same way, too. So IMHO you can continue with your good work. Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, usually people explain their opposing vote (like here). And there are more than one way to express an idea or to formulate a subjective opinion. Last time it happened, the user finally understood through the discussion their own misjudgment and turned the oppose vote into a support . We should be rationale. Let's just conclude, then -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Standing people