Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A tourist lady in Jameh Mosque of Isfahan.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:A tourist lady in Jameh Mosque of Isfahan.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2019 at 07:17:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose blurry lady doesn't work for me, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 14:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Iifar: blurry person in architectural photography for show scales not problem--Amirpashaei (talk) 14:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support The more I think about it, the blurry person doesn't actually bother me. It is indeed good for showing the scale. Cmao20 (talk) 18:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Per Cmao20. --Pugilist (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
chromatic aberration on the brickwork. Difficult scene that might require at least three combined shots (lady, overall, windows) to make it really good. --Cart (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)- Support If I pixel-peep, she's blurry. At full screen she's fine and like a painting all primary colours (yellow, red, blue). She's standing exactly in the spots of light from the window, and framed by the arch in the rear wall. And the brickwork with spirals and diagonals is well described with light cement contrasting. Yes I wish the glare from the window was handled better, but it can be really hard when you point your lens straight at a bright window. I do hope she isn't photoshopped in. Could you save your JPG with some EXIF data and an embedded colourspace please. -- Colin (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Regretfully I agree with Cart... Tournasol7 (talk) 15:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @W.carter: , @Colin: , @Tournasol7: , @Iifar: , you're right. thanks for your nice critiques. I improved the light. I fixed chromatic aberration and I improved blurry lady. I think because the picture merged from 3 shots(HDR)photoshop cant save file with EXIF.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's better, move to Support. For the exif, you can take one of the photos and add this as a top layer to it and merge into one. I know it will not cover all three shots, but it will be close enough and better that no exif. --Cart (talk) 17:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not so worried about the EXIF data for camera lens, exposure, etc (though it is nice to add that detail for a complex shot to the description). You may have lost the colour profile when doing the HDR so may have to assign one again (e.g. sRGB) and don't use Photoshop's 'save for web' but instead use the save option that preserves exif. That way the image has a colour profile and we all see the same colours. Btw, it is a shame the lady's primary colours are not so vivid in the new version. Perhaps that is realistic, though -- you can judge from your individual exposures. What are you using for HDR? --Colin (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @W.carter: thanks again Mr carter . The way you said it didn't work. the photo taken with 24mm tilt shift lens. 6D canon. f:14 , iso 100, exposure time (2,4,8) seconds.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Too bad, it usually works for me. I've added the Template:Photo Information to the file, you can use that instead. I've filled in some of what you wrote here, but please correct if I got something wrong and feel free to fill in the rest. Also, I'm a "Miss" not a "Mr". :-) --Cart (talk) 17:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- excuse me Miss carter for my mistake. thanks for your useful information and your kindness.--Amirpashaei (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's better, move to
Weak oppose Better now but still has a lot of CA. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: I fixed chromatic aberration Mr Case. is this OK?--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ivar Poco a poco (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: I fixed chromatic aberration, blurry lady and artifact. is this another problem Mr Silva?--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Many improvements since the original nomination. OK for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Noting special. -- Karelj (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Gnosis (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
