Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A small boy tries to look mean for the camera in Afghanistan.jpg

File:A small boy tries to look mean for the camera in Afghanistan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2016 at 19:27:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:A small boy tries to look mean for the camera in Afghanistan.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A small boy tries to look mean for the camera in Afghanistan.jpg

427

7

2547

2196

3504

2211

suggestion of crop

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People #Standing people
•  Info created by Fred W. Baker III - uploaded by Slick-o-bot - nominated by Reguyla -- Reguyla (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Reguyla (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Question - I haven't figured out whether or how to vote on this, but what it is about this photo that makes you consider it featurable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Ikan Kekek When I saw the picture the intense look on the kids face along with the clarity of the image struck me and made me think it would be a good candidate for FP. Reguyla (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

On reflection, and after looking at the photo again, I think you're right. The photo is rather memorable. I also can't understand using the idea of the photo being good for Time or Life as a reason to oppose a feature. I  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose I like the idea but I wonder if perhaps the boy's expression is him registering his displeasure with being cropped so tightly. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose This may be a pic for Time or ye olde LIFE magazine, but it has nothing FP for me. w.carter-Talk 12:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support If it's good enough for ol' LIFE, then it's good enough for me. And FPC ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support nice quality, pretty sharp, and powerful eyes, 3x2 is weird uh, I would crop tighter, and vertical, or a square, square would work here... -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 14:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Alt

• Cropped to 1x1 and contrast increased. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 14:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

• I  Oppose the alt version. I disagree that a square picture works best in this case. It feels cramped, and I simply prefer the original composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No, no, no, no. Alt version: "... it doesn't work this way, too." w.carter-Talk 13:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  • ??? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 14:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

• It's a quote used by those nerds who love that movie too. :) Just a small innocent addition in case there are some of them here. I know that there are many movie enthusiasts at Commons. It's nothing important. w.carter-Talk 18:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)