Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:5 (معماری حرم امام رضا (ع.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:5 (معماری حرم امام رضا (ع.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2021 at 21:05:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Iran
Info created by Soroush.javadian - uploaded by Soroush.javadian - nominated by 4nn1l2 -- 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Support I had been told that this image was not sharp enough. However, the image got the 3rd rank in the national contest of WLM Iran 2020. Hence, I would like to see how the community at large judges this image. Thanks -- 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)- Support The composition is really good and the colours wonderful. I agree (with your linked comment) Amirpashaei has taken some excellent photos of similar architecture that are first-class. This is 36MP so not downsized like some nominations we get here. This has some great 3D feel and perspective. I also suggest File:6 (معماری حرم امام رضا (ع.jpg is a contender -- that is such an arresting view and excellent mix of architecture and people. -- Colin (talk) 21:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's very nice. My one problem is the man at the bottom of the second opening from the right whose smirk is so direct and intense that he almost looks photoshopped (I don't think he is, of course). Also he's melting into the railing behind him. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well spotted Rhododendrites. There's definitely a stitching error there, running vertically and causing problems with the arch above too. Shame. Just to clarify, your comment and mine here are about the other "contender" that I mentioned, not this nomination. -- Colin (talk) 11:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Cbrescia (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Iran's architectural pictures really amaze me. --Gnosis (talk) 00:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment I see I changed my mind. Well, what did Emerson say about a foolish consistency being the hobgoblin of small minds? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support The "wow" of this definitely makes up for any other shortcomings. Most eye-catching thing at FPC at the moment IMO. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Andrei (talk) 22:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Insufficient quality for me: left and lower part and right upper corner totally blurred, CA's everywhere, noise. --A.Savin 00:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Very interesting, but IMO not sharp enough and CAs. Bottom left should be sharp. --XRay 💬 07:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Colin and Rhododendrites. Incredible composition even if the quality does not match. Bear in mind that this is a 36mpx image. Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support IamMM (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Moderate support The CA is not as bad as some submissions here with far less DoF. And I love the color. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Iran
