Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4th Special Operations Squadron - AC-130U - 2008.jpg

File:4th Special Operations Squadron - AC-130U - 2008.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2016 at 17:41:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:4th Special Operations Squadron - AC-130U - 2008.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4th Special Operations Squadron - AC-130U - 2008.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
•  Info created by U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Julianne Showalter - uploaded by Bwmoll3 - nominated by Reguyla -- Reguyla (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Reguyla (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Really nice angel flares but much of the pic is rather noisy, any chance of getting it a bit denoised? --cart-Talk 18:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Good point. I'll see if I can clean it up. Reguyla (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Morning (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support great photo! I want to take a similar with a russian airplane :) --Ralf Roleček 20:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral I can give a pass to the amount of noise in this image because of its unique perspective. But the posterization and false color is simply too distracting for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 10:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a dramatic image but the quality is just too poor. At thumbnail it is ok but even at modest preview sizes one can see the posterization, false colours and grain -- this image had been post processed too far. And by PaintShopPro of all things. It appears to have been upscaled (thus emphasising the grainy dots) as the D200 only has 3872 pixels width an this is 4200. Wish we had access to the raw file. -- Colin (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Colin, the over-all quality is pretty poor. There is a version with less destructive processing available at File:Defense.gov News Photo 080820-F-5957S-958.jpg, but that one's pretty soft. --El Grafo (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)