Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360 Grad Wildgrubenspitzen.jpg

File:360 Grad Wildgrubenspitzen.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2011 at 19:43:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:360 Grad Wildgrubenspitzen.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360 Grad Wildgrubenspitzen.jpg

•  Info created & uploaded by Böhringer - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The only fault I see is that I'm not there. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 19:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversaturated and disturbing glare and another stitched pano. W.S. 21:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Incredible. Is this HDR, or naturally lighted? InverseHypercube (talk) 00:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Info no HDR --Böhringer (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  OpposeAs Wetenschatje !!! --Llorenzi (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The glare is pretty much unavoidable since by definition you are shooting into the sun for a 360 pano. Overall, nice image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Incredible detail, nice colors - 360° pano as good as it gets! If there is any suggestion for improvement that I could make, it would be to crop out the top 10% of the image, so that the horizon is not located in the middle (Rule of Thirds). As a side effect, the size of the file would be reduced. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per W.S. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support danke für die Nominierung Tomer T --Böhringer (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Bitte Schön :) Tomer T (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Stryn (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Raghith 16:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Question How did you level the image? The horizon seems to be lower in the middle. Is that due to the mountains being lower? -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

mit PTGui --Böhringer (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Wie, nicht womit. Irgendeine Automatikfunktion? Apparently your tripod (be it real, be it virtual) is not exactly level, i.e. de:Sulzfluh and de:Valluga (both 2800+x) show at different heights in the image. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose per W.S. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the horizon cutting the picture in the middle (and also think it's not straight). Also wish author provides complete spherical panorama (360° on both horizontal and vertical axis), otherwise, it just doesn't work properly with the panorama viewer provided. - Benh (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per WS on the technical issues. Steven Walling 22:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- As I said many times, I'm not fond of extreme panoramas. However, this new idea of using them with a pano viewer is nice and may help changing my position. In this particular case, it is a shame that part of the sky is blown white and colors seem oversaturated. Otherwise it is a great picture! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per WS--Miguel Bugallo 00:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)