Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2021-07-30 Messeberg Hoheneggelsen Sommer.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2021-07-30 Messeberg Hoheneggelsen Sommer.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2022 at 22:02:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
- Info created by Rohieb (talk) – uploaded by Rohieb (talk) – nominated by Rohieb -- Rohieb (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support – interested what others think of it. -- Rohieb (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition but not extremely outstanding to me; others may feel differently. However, there is a lot of color noise and nothing is very sharp, so it's not a Featured Picture, and I wouldn't expect it to pass if nominated at com:qic, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not special enough, in my view. Noisy. Quality issue -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per opposers above, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Didn’t look into it closer for technical issues but the motif as such is nothing exceptional to me, sorry. One could take dozens like this on a summer walk in the fields. --Kreuzschnabel 07:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing too wrong with this photo, good composition, but there is colour noise, a bit of uncorrected perspective distortion, plus for me the colours are a bit too saturated/over the top Cmao20 (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose An ordinary scene on a beautiful summer day. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, too many opposes in three days Ezarateesteban 23:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- That is not a valid reason for FPX, I'm afraid. As far as the guidelines go, there's nothing wrong with this photo, it's just not all that wow-y. The proper procedure is explained here: If it has no support other than the nominator's after 5 days, it will be speedily declined automatically. --El Grafo (talk) 10:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good composition, but in full resolution too many technical issues. --Milseburg (talk) 13:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)