Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20190225 Seefeld NK 2719.jpg

File:20190225 Seefeld NK 2719.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2020 at 13:57:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:20190225 Seefeld NK 2719.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20190225 Seefeld NK 2719.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
•  Info created & uploaded by Ailura - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That is one impressive panning! Ailura clearly knows how to work a camera, still it would be nice to have the Exif data to tell us something about the technical details, please. The file name is also too ambiguous/misguiding and should be better, but after the nom is closed to avoid all the code mess. --Cart (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support way better than I could ever do! —Granada (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Tomer T: So this nom is why you closed your own nom as 'featured' without waiting for the FPCBot to do the fifth-day closing. Why the hurry? Ok, it's not forbidden to do so, providing that you did the math correctly with the time, but it's not good form and to be on the safe side with the days, it's best to let the Bot close the nom correctly. Especially your own. Please let the system work for you, no need to push it as hard as you can. --Cart (talk) 19:18, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

  I really don't see the problem. I understand it's your personal choice to wait for the bot, but there's no reason to do so - the nom was closed according to all rules. I also don't see why it's relevant in this discussion, more proper to my talk page for example or FPC talk page, where you can suggest to obligate a wait for the bot. Tomer T (talk) 19:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• It is relevant to this discussion, since you closed the nom to be able to open this nom. I also think it is vital that you as an admin think about what example you are setting by doing so. You may be able do do what is within the rules, but other users, not as experienced as you, might see it fit to follow your example with less good result. There are a lot of things that are not written in the rules of this forum, just good etiquette. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• Let me just remind that a manual close is still an explicitly mentioned viable option in FPC. I can see why you see it as unwanted practice so I'll avoid it, but maybe we should change the guidelines. Honestly, I don't really see someone using this option wrongfully or abusively, it's just a simple 5 days count, but let it be. Tomer T (talk) 20:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• Well, to be honest, neither can I at the moment. But having been around this site for a while, and helped clean up a few messes, I've seen how 'creative' people can be when it comes to cutting corners to get stars and awards. That is why I'm wary and value the safer way. And I'm also happy to let it be for now. --Cart (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:43, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The most impressive in this image is the blurry background! I remember a photo challenge about panning, this one would have been a great candidate! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others, and oddly enough, I kind of agree with Basile on this. It's as if in the instant that the photo was snapped, the ski jumper was still and everything else was moving! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Hmmm pretty sharp for a panning photo. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 13:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Cayambe (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support But unfortunately no metadata --Llez (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Ailura always strips the Metadata from her uploads. —Granada (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Short description would be great:) Tournasol7 (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

• What exactly are you missing? The athlete's name is in the description but I could add some more info as I've been to Seefeld last year as well. --Granada (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports