Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018-12-1 HK St. Alfred's Church View.jpg

File:2018-12-1 HK St. Alfred's Church View.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2019 at 11:49:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2018-12-1 HK St. Alfred's Church View.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018-12-1 HK St. Alfred's Church View.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by SCP-2000 - uploaded by SCP-2000 - nominated by SCP-2000 -- SCP-2000 (talk) 11:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- SCP-2000 (talk) 11:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Way too noisy for FP, considering all the fantastic church interior photos that are FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I did Denoise for the image.Is it better now? SCP-2000 (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

• I don't know, but you're competing in the same category as Diliff and several other fantastic photographers, so my vote remains as is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Left and right sides are unsharp. I'm afraid that in this day and age it will be hard to get an interior photo taken at high ISO featured. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose good composition but too noisy. --Pine (✉) 02:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others above, really sorry--Boothsift 04:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose A useful picture, and as per above the composition is good, but in quality terms this falls a long way short of our best church interiors. Have a look at the church interiors of Diliff, Uoaei1 and Poco a poco, to name only three, to see the kind of photography that would be considered strong material at FP. These usually tend to be shot with a tripod to enable a longer exposure at low ISO. Some authors also produce high-resolution stitched panoramas using a panoramic head. All this is probably worth investigating if you're interested in producing better-quality church interiors (not that this one is bad, but it's not FP). Cmao20 (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Vulphere 18:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose Unsharpness and blown highlights. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)