Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017-11-16 Michael Müller (Wiki Loves Parliaments 2017 in Berlin) by Sandro Halank.jpg

File:2017-11-16 Michael Müller (Wiki Loves Parliaments 2017 in Berlin) by Sandro Halank.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2018 at 15:28:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2017-11-16 Michael Müller (Wiki Loves Parliaments 2017 in Berlin) by Sandro Halank.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017-11-16 Michael Müller (Wiki Loves Parliaments 2017 in Berlin) by Sandro Halank.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Sandro Halank - uploaded by Sandro Halank - nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment The colors seem too saturated. His skin is too pink. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment This nomination reminds me those : [1], [2], [3] -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too flat light in his face. You had the softboxes mounted a bit too low (probably with their horizontal center in the height of the eyes) and that leads to a completely flat skin which looks at least odd. In portraiture with flash lights in general you put the lower end of your softboxes to the height of the nose tip. --Granada (talk) 08:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per comments made at [1]. -- Colin (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good id photo but for me too stiff and uninteresting as an FP. --Cart (talk) 19:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Dry-blanket support It may be flat but to me this is a strength. He radiates confidence and leadership this way. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

• Daniel Case: I don't understand how you can support an image with this problems, and then oppose others which are of much better quality. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: And that's why we have aesthetics. Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well-made and it certainly deserves the QI and VI badges it's already got. But otherwise ist's just another portrait to me without anything special that would set it apart from the masses. Yes, he's radiating a bit, but by far not enough to make me go "WOW!" --El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Without voting I want to object to Granada. He has already a dark shade under his chin, set the lights still higher would strengthen this effect. In my opinion at least one of the lights should be set lower than higher to illuminate the face more even. --Stepro (talk) 01:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)