Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016R1282 - Київ.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2016R1282 - Київ.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2017 at 16:58:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Мирослав Видрак - uploaded by Мирослав Видрак - nominated by Мирослав Видрак -- Мирослав Видрак (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Мирослав Видрак (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I have an opinion about this photo, but what I'm most interested in is why you think this is one of the most outstanding photos on Commons. Please make an argument for it; I'd like to read it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - It's my best photo of the window. --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Understood. However, your best photo of this window could still be a QI and not an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not convinced; the colours are nice but the composition is somewhat lacking. Adding to that the heavy distortion on the top and the right side, there's the reason for my vote.--Peulle (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)- Weak Support. The upper crop may be a bit too tight but otherwise the composition is very good for me. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle. It's also unsharp in those areas. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like a random tourist shot taken when exploring a new city in a hurry: 1) it's tilted; 2) top of the upper window decoration is chopped; 3) right side has shadow which covers about 1/4 of the picture (means random timing). -- Pofka (talk) 18:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Pofka: , not the first time I notice you use very harsh, unpleasant, hurtful and vexatious words in your reviews. This is useless, and minore the value of your oppose. Please remember that someone, Miroslav, a human being, took this picture. IMO, your oppose review could begin by your "1)".--Jebulon (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: It might sound harsh but I do not intend to write it harsh. I'm sorry if it sounds like that. I provided three arguments why I think it looks like a tourist shot taken in a hurry. During my trips I often have the same issues in my pictures like these three due to the same reasons. I delete most of such pictures immediately and try to recapture it without such issues which greatly lowers the value of the image. -- Pofka (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Pofka: Thanks for cool and mellow answer.--Jebulon (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: It might sound harsh but I do not intend to write it harsh. I'm sorry if it sounds like that. I provided three arguments why I think it looks like a tourist shot taken in a hurry. During my trips I often have the same issues in my pictures like these three due to the same reasons. I delete most of such pictures immediately and try to recapture it without such issues which greatly lowers the value of the image. -- Pofka (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Pofka: , not the first time I notice you use very harsh, unpleasant, hurtful and vexatious words in your reviews. This is useless, and minore the value of your oppose. Please remember that someone, Miroslav, a human being, took this picture. IMO, your oppose review could begin by your "1)".--Jebulon (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
