Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016.07.09.-10-Bossee Felde--Haubentaucher-Paar mit Kueken.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2016.07.09.-10-Bossee Felde--Haubentaucher-Paar mit Kueken.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2017 at 14:04:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Hockei (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment Only one adult is shown in this photo. Charles (talk)
- Comment - I was going to say the same thing. Can you specify in your file description whether this is the mother or the father? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- ... if I'd know that. --Hockei (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that this would be a species in which the male and female birds look the same to us humans, without our ultraviolet light perception. Is that true? I like your new version and will support it, once you change the file description to "Great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) parent with chicks", since we see only one parent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
changed --Hockei (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Based on the photo you took showing both birds, this is the male. Charles (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- If so, that should be specified in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- I didn't realize that this would be a species in which the male and female birds look the same to us humans, without our ultraviolet light perception. Is that true? I like your new version and will support it, once you change the file description to "Great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) parent with chicks", since we see only one parent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- ... if I'd know that. --Hockei (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support - lol, the last chick is too cute...little webbed feet trailing behind. Atsme 📞 02:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Posterization on the birds. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- There is no posterization at all. I never produce posterization, mainly because I don't use unsharp mask. What you see is dense plumage covered with water. --Hockei (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, this could be much better even on that focal, and you could clone out particles in water. --Mile (talk) 07:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- See my comment above. I won't clone anything. Neither out nor in, except removing dust spots coming from lens or sensor. --Hockei (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Info I've uploaded a new version with a bit more sharpness and contrast. Comment I don't mind what reasons you find for an oppose. That you say that this picture is better is ridiculous. --Hockei (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- weak support per cuteness factor --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. --Karelj (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Hockei (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)}}
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /M★Zaplotnik (edits) 11:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
