Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014-12-18 Fortuna, Johannes Benk at Neue Burg, Vienna -hu- 6224.jpg

File:2014-12-18 Fortuna, Johannes Benk at Neue Burg, Vienna -hu- 6224.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2015 at 22:29:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2014-12-18 Fortuna, Johannes Benk at Neue Burg, Vienna -hu- 6224.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014-12-18 Fortuna, Johannes Benk at Neue Burg, Vienna -hu- 6224.jpg

•  Info all by Hubertl, Fortuna, a figure by Johannes Benk at the roof of the Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna-- Hubertl (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Hubertl (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good weather, nice composition, high quality and it has educational value. --Code (talk) 17:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support "Equipped" the girl --LivioAndronico talk 07:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I like the light. --Ximonic (talk) 12:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose The quality(detail, sharpness) is just a QI but not a FP and other elements are not special, means no wow. Sorry. --Laitche (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Obvious QI, and interesting light, but no wow. It looks like a shot anyone could come up with, although I can see that at 800mm, not anyone would get this point of view. Am very envious of your gear ;-) - Benh (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. --Fotoriety (talk) 07:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with the comments above. A good shot, but I'd expect more for FP. The lighting is not optimal either resulting in some disturbing shadows. The centered composition could work for me but the piece of building in the background is distracting. Poco² 08:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect picture without any errors! Congratulations! FP for me! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 14:36, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • But with halos... --Laitche (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Superb. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:34, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Why do I try to improve my photographic skills when, obviously, having friends amongst contributors seems to be enough to earn votes. Or maybe I'm wrong and it's just that the statue from Vienna has dragged Austrian users here ? - Benh (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • and Italians ... --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    • At least the Italian votes, and all other but the two last, are from regular contributors here. - Benh (talk) 19:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
      • I really don't catch you. What's wrong with that?--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
        • Well you're right, nothing is wrong if we go by the rules. Surprised to see these users popping out when the nom was on a negative trend. Wouldn't be suspicious if they were more regular contributors to FPC, and not Austrian. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm not that regular a contributor here after all. - Benh (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Benh: Let's enjoy the FPC :) --Laitche (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Slaunger (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects